RESOURCES | BLOG

Ensuring Peak Equipment Performance: OLI’s Corrosion Analyzer for Proactive Prevention and Downtime Reduction in Upstream Oil and Gas

Diana Miller

Senior Applications Engineer and Pre-sales Lead

Corrosion in upstream oil and gas operations presents significant challenges, contributing to safety risks, equipment failures, and production losses. According to the National Association of Corrosion Engineers (NACE), now AMPP, global corrosion costs exceed $2.5 trillion annually, with the oil and gas sector accounting for a substantial portion (Koch et al., 2002). These staggering figures underscore the critical role field corrosion engineers play in maintaining operational reliability. Their work not only ensures uptime but also minimizes safety risks and reduces costs associated with corrosion-related inefficiencies.

Addressing these challenges becomes more manageable with a scientific and predictive approach. Tools such as the OLI Studio: Corrosion Analyzer provide a first-principles thermodynamic framework that integrates the interplay of complex chemistry and corrosion kinetics to predict corrosion rates and localized corrosion susceptibility. The OLI Studio: Corrosion Analyzer equips engineers with actionable insights to effectively predict, understand, and mitigate corrosion risks, making it an invaluable tool in the upstream oil and gas sector.

Challenges Faced by Field Corrosion Engineers 

Field corrosion engineers operate in very demanding environments, where they must maintain equipment integrity while minimizing downtime. They are responsible for protecting assets continuously exposed to aggressive operating conditions. Upstream oil and gas assets are particularly vulnerable, as they are subjected to corrosive fluids and in some cases at high-temperature, high-pressure (HTHP) conditions that accelerate material degradation (Shreir et al., 2013).

Diagnosing and responding to corrosion incidents is a significant part of an engineer’s role. A failure to act quickly or accurately can lead to operational disruptions, jeopardizing safety and profitability. Engineers must also strike a delicate balance between proactive measures to prevent corrosion and reactive strategies to address failures when they occur. This requires a combination of deep field expertise, advanced diagnostic tools, and a robust understanding of the dynamic operating conditions found in upstream environments.

Corrosion in Upstream Operations: A Multifaceted Problem

The upstream oil and gas sector is characterized by a variety of corrosion mechanisms, each influenced by specific environmental and operational factors. Harsh operating conditions, including high salinity and chloride content, create aggressive environments that promote pitting and crevice corrosion. Produced water, often laden with chlorides, sulfates, and other ions, exacerbates localized corrosion, particularly in areas where protective films on metal surfaces are destabilized. In high-pressure, high-temperature (HPHT) environments, the accelerated corrosion kinetics pose additional challenges to material longevity.

Dynamic operating conditions further complicate the picture. Fluctuations in temperature and pressure can alter the phase behavior of fluids, creating unexpected corrosive scenarios. System shutdowns and start-ups, as well as unplanned events, often introduce severe risks, such as water condensation, which can accelerate degradation.

Specific to upstream operations, CO₂ and H₂S corrosion present unique challenges. When CO₂ dissolves in water, it forms carbonic acid, which drives both general and localized corrosion. Similarly, the presence of H₂S increases the risk of sulfide stress cracking and pitting, particularly in alloys not suited for sour environments (de Waard & Lotz, 1993).

The complexity of fluid chemistry makes it imperative to adopt advanced modeling tools capable of simulating these intricate systems.

A Scientific Solution for Complex Environments 

To tackle these multifaceted challenges, OLI Studio: Corrosion Analyzer offers a scientifically validated thermodynamic framework for predicting and diagnosing corrosion risks. Built on more than 5 decades of research in electrolyte chemistry, the software accurately simulates multi-phase systems, including (but not limited to) the critical gas-liquid equilibria found in oil and gas production wells (Anderko et al., 2001). Its ability to model the speciation and chemical equilibria of species across different phases ensures reliable predictions of corrosion behavior under complex operating conditions.

The software’s strength lies in its ability to translate these thermodynamic insights into actionable results for field engineers. By inputting operational parameters such as pressure, temperature, and fluid composition, users can assess corrosion risks with a high degree of confidence. The alignment of OLI’s simulations with laboratory measurements and peer-reviewed data published in the literature further supports the credibility of its predictions. This capability enables engineers to anticipate and mitigate risks through proactive assessments or to diagnose failures by reconstructing scenarios that reveal the root causes of material degradation.

How OLI Corrosion Analyzer Addresses These Challenges 

OLI Corrosion Analyzer addresses the challenges of upstream corrosion through its robust functionalities. It supports proactive monitoring by allowing engineers to evaluate critical factors such as CO₂ partial pressure, fugacities, pH, and chloride concentration. This enables them to make real-time adjustments to operating conditions, mitigating risks before they escalate. The tool’s scenario modeling capabilities allow engineers to define safe operational envelopes tailored to specific assets, ensuring long-term reliability.

In the event of a corrosion incident, the software facilitates reactive diagnosis by reconstructing failure scenarios. Engineers can identify the chemical conditions that led to corrosion, whether they involve acidic condensation, salinity spikes, or temperature fluctuations. This root cause analysis informs the development of future mitigation strategies, ensuring that lessons learned are effectively applied.

Beyond prevention and diagnosis, OLI Corrosion Analyzer helps refine corrosion management programs. Insights from its simulations enable engineers to optimize corrosion inhibitor strategies, adjust operational parameters, and select materials that are better suited to specific field conditions. These tailored solutions ensure that corrosion mitigation efforts are not only effective but also cost-efficient.

 

Advancing Corrosion Science in Upstream Oil and Gas

OLI Systems has established itself as a leader in corrosion science by combining decades of research with practical applications. The company’s commitment to innovation ensures that field engineers are equipped with tools capable of solving even the most complex corrosion challenges. By integrating thermodynamic precision into corrosion management, OLI enables engineers to optimize safety, performance, and cost-efficiency across the lifecycle of upstream assets.

Conclusion

Corrosion in upstream oil and gas is a persistent challenge, but it doesn’t have to be a demanding one. OLI Studio: Corrosion Analyzer provides field engineers with the scientific tools needed to anticipate, diagnose, and mitigate corrosion risks. From improving safety and reliability to reducing costs, OLI ensures operational excellence across the lifecycle of your assets.

Are you ready to transform the way you manage corrosion? Take the next step by booking a demo, reaching out to our experts, or downloading our latest resources to learn more about how OLI Corrosion Analyzer can enhance your operations.

References

  • Koch, G. H., Brongers, M. P. H., Thompson, N. G., Virmani, Y. P., & Payer, J. H. (2002). Corrosion Costs and Preventive Strategies in the United States. NACE International. Retrieved from https://www.ampp.org/about/impact-of-corrosion
  • Shreir, L. L., Jarman, R. A., & Burstein, G. T. (2013). Corrosion: Metal/Environment Reactions (3rd Edition). Butterworth-Heinemann. DOI: 10.1016/C2011-0-04351-8
  • De Waard, C., & Lotz, U. (1993). Prediction of CO Corrosion of Carbon Steel. Corrosion, 47(12), 976–985. DOI: 10.5006/1.3316066
  • Anderko, A., Young, R. D., & Deng, T. (2001). Simulation of Corrosion in Multiphase Systems Using a Thermodynamic Model. Corrosion, 57(3), 202–213. DOI: 10.5006/1.3290353